- The Weed Blog https://www.theweedblog.com

California Supreme Court Will Hear Oral Arguments In Dispensary Zoning Dispute On Feb 5th


Gavel marijuana leafCalifornia Supreme Court picks February 5th for oral arguments to decide whether municipalities can ban local distribution of medical marijuana

by Kris Hermes

The California Supreme Court scheduled oral arguments this week in a case that has received widespread attention inside and outside of the medical marijuana community. The appellate court ruling in City of Riverside v. Inland Empire Patients Health and Wellness Center is being reviewed by the High Court in order to address the issue of whether municipalities can use zoning regulations to ban outright the local distribution of medical marijuana.

Oral arguments in the Riverside case will be held in a special session of the California Supreme Court on Tuesday, February 5th at 10:15am at the University of San Francisco (USF) School of Law.

In addition to the Riverside case, a number of other appellate court rulings from southern California focusing on the same issues were granted review by the Court, including County of Los Angeles v. Alternative Medicinal Cannabis Collective, 420 Caregivers v. City of Los Angeles, City of Lake Forest v. Evergreen Holistic Collective, and People v. G3 Holistic.

Notably, two of these appellate rulings held that local officials may not ban distribution and must develop regulations instead. Specifically, the County of Los Angeles decision from July 2012 overturned a local ban on dispensaries, reversing the lower court’s preliminary injunction from the previous year. The appellate court in County of Los Angeles held that “medical marijuana collectives…are permitted by state law to perform a dispensary function,” and that “[Los Angeles] County’s total, per se nuisance ban against medical marijuana dispensaries directly contradicts the Legislature’s intent.” The Court further concluded that, a “complete ban” on medical marijuana is “preempted” by state law and, therefore, void.

Yet, other appellate court decisions have sided with municipal governments in their cynical effort to push out any form of safe and legal access to medical marijuana.

Rest assured, however, that Americans for Safe Access will work with the lawyers in the Riverside case to obtain a ruling from the California Supreme Court favorable to patients across the state. Just as with its amicus ‘friend of the court’ brief filed last year in the Riverside case, ASA will continue to fight for safe access. “While municipalities may pass reasonable regulations over the location and operation of medical marijuana collectives, they cannot ban them absolutely,” read ASA’s amicus brief. “These bans thwart the Legislature’s stated objectives of ensuring access to marijuana for the seriously ill persons who need it in a uniform manner throughout the state.”

See you at USF next month!

Article From Americans For Safe AccessDonate


About Author


  1. About a quarter of all adult Americans imbibe Marijuana, many for medicinal reasons. The Majority of Californians voted for Prop. 215 – and it became state law. There is no reason that any city or county within the state can defy the vote of the majority of Californians by banning dispensaries.

  2. I and also my pals came analyzing the great key points
    on the website while the sudden came up with an awful feeling I never thanked
    the website owner for those tips. All the people were definitely stimulated to
    read them and have in truth been having fun with those things. Thank you for
    genuinely well kind and for opting for this form of wonderful subject matter
    most people are really needing to discover. My very own honest regret for not
    expressing appreciation to you sooner. http://marijuanaaccessories.com/ http://mustbehigh.com/ http://legalize.co/

Leave A Reply