- The Weed Blog https://www.theweedblog.com

Michigan House Unveils Brand-New Medical Marijuana Provisioning Centers Act


michigan marijuanaA yer and a half ago the Michigan House of Representatives passed the Provisioning Centers Act and the associated Smoking Alternatives Bills by near-unanimous consent. They were not voted on before the 2013-14 session expired and were reintroduced this year. On Tuesday a new version of those bills will be presented to the House Judiciary Committee that look almost nothing like the proposals that had the support of the medical marijuana community.

Although there exists no public copies of the newest drafts of HB 4209 and HB 4210, some things are known. These bills will not allow caregivers to sell their overages to a dispensary. Any cannabis sold to any dispensary, called Provisioning Centers, will have to be intentionally created for commercial distribution in licensed commercial grow operations of from 500 – 1,500 plants, the rumors say, with the exception of a caregiver selling to their five patients and ONLY their five patients.

Some of these issues were discussed on the Planet Green Trees Radio Show, on an episode featuring Robin Schneider of the National Patients Rights Association. The NPRA has been moderating the decline of the bills as best they can, but newcomers in the game of lobbying legislators have diverted the intent from being a patient-friendly bill to one that unzips the pants of big business.

“This could be the end of the caregiver system as we know it,” Jim Powers noted on that episode of the Planet Green Trees Radio Show. Powers has haunted the House and Senate chambers for two years, pushing the lawmakers to enact legislation to protect the non-smoked forms of cannabis used by his son Ryan and other pediatric cannabis patients across the state. That bill – HB 4210- is tied to the fate of the Provisioning Centers Act.

Our two old friends- the Provisioning Centers Act was originated in 2011, the Smoking Alternatives bill in 2013- have a new invisible friend to play with, HB  4827, the Seed to Sale Bill.

It’s The Invisible Bill because it has been assigned a bill number, is already listed as being considered by the House Judiciary, but there is no mention of the bill anywhere on the Michigan government websites. No text, no sponsors listed, no introductory date, nothing.

We do know what the playmate is all about, though. The House Judiciary Committee meeting notice offers a description of HB 4827: “Marihuana; administration; seed-to-sale tracking system for commercial marihuana; establish.” We also know who sponsored the bill.

That would be the Chair of the House Judiciary Committee himself, Oakland County Republican Rep. Klint Kesto, who is rumored to be eyeing a run at Bill Schuette’s spot as Attorney General in 2018.

We also know he must have been pretty impressed with the out-of-state company called MJ Freeway, who are giving a presentation during Tuesday’s Judiciary Committee meeting on their specific seed-to-sale program, which the State of Michigan would have to buy from them. Their website offers programs called “Gramtracker”, Mixtracker”, and “Growtracker”. Kesto must have been so impressed with their sales pitch that he drafted a bill to adopt their program.

Hell, we haven’t seen this degree of- let’s politely call it ‘encouraged legislative support for a specific commercial interest’- since Randy Richardville and the SB 660 Prairie Plant, pot-for-pharmacies bill in 2013. That bill shot through both the House and Senate- and was signed by the Governor- within three months.

Prairie Plant is a Canadian company. MJ Freeway is a Colorado group. When will these guys start following Governor Snyder’s Pure Michigan theme and shop close to home?

MJ is not without her set of problems. In November of 2014 MJ Biz Daily reported that MJ Freeway left users of the system “screwed” and individual dispensaries using the system “lost $25,000 in revenue on Thursday alone” due to a failure in the company’s software upgrade, per MJ customer’s quotes. That problem has been solved, per an update to the Business Daily story, but should give lawmakers reason to pause.

This is the official notice from the House Judiciary Committee:

Standing Committee Meeting

Judiciary, Rep. Klint Kesto, Chair

DATE: Tuesday, August 18, 2015

TIME: 9:00 AM

PLACE: Room 521, House Office Building, Lansing, MI


MJ Freeway Business Solutions on marihuana tracking.


HB 4209 (Rep. Callton)  Health; medical marihuana; state and local regulation of marihuana provisioning centers; provide for.

HB 4210 (Rep. Lyons)    Health; medical marihuana; marihuana-infused products; allow and regulate.


HB 4827           (Rep. Kesto)    Marihuana; administration; seed-to-sale tracking system for commercial marihuana; establish.


To view text of legislation go to:

Committee Clerk: Melissa Weipert
Phone: 517-373-5176
e-Mail: mweipert@house.mi.gov


The versions of HB 4209 and HB 4210 that were modified and compromised through the 2013-14 legislative session, and were one step away from becoming law, are still on the Michigan government website. You can print them and evaluate the changes presented on Tuesday. That is, provided Rep. Michael Callton (R-Nashville) ensures that the newest draft of HB 4209 that his office has authorized for debate by the Judiciary is available for citizens to read.

Rep. Kesto’s contact information:

PHONE: 517-373-1799
EMAIL: KlintKesto@house.mi.gov

Rep. Callton’s contact informaion:

PHONE: 517-373-0842


About Author

"Rick Thompson was the Editor in Chief for the entire 2-year run of the Michigan Medical Marijuana Magazine, was the spokesman for the Michigan Association of Compassion Centers and is the current Editor and Lead Blogger for The Compassion Chronicles. Rick has addressed committees in both the House and Senate, has authored over 200 articles on marijuana and is a professional photographer." Rick Thompson Is An Author At The Compassion Chronicles and focuses on all things Michigan.


  1. what part of the state are you located in Bryan? I might be interested in becoming a patient of yours. do you do other things besides certifications?

  2. you can bet that lobbyist from big pharma have a hand in this too. this is a threat to them and so they need to keep it illegal or so they can have their cut, one or the other but they won’t let us just have it. that’s too much of a threat to them , they just might loose patients . awww wouldn’t that be terrible. get a few of these poor people who haven’t got a clue as to what big pharma is doing to them, off the poisons and they might feel better . I know I do!! I agree with you Bryan it is a shame that greed can dictate how we treat our illnesses.

  3. look like $$ is what is driving this through not the interest of the patients in Michigan. why else would they be that specific as to which business would be allowed to take over the operation. ? hopefully they will leave farmers and their patients alone. I think they will find they are going to have the same problem, of not being able to supply enough product to cover the need, like Canada did.

  4. Wonderful comment Dennis .
    It certainly would be nice if our elected representatives actually did work for us instead of selling us out so cheaply to big business .

  5. George Van Setters on

    I ll wait to see the bill, but sounds like the same ole same ole………………

  6. I am a board certified licensed physician here in the state of Michigan who is an advocate for medical marijuana and no way exists that I would support the rumored program. Reason being: To much greed already exists in medicine and at present we have to hard a time getting getting fully legal technically inexpensive medications, to ever let the greed of these producers get involved. I much prefer the current system. How horrible of these people to put so much greed against helping sick people with something that can be safely grown in a home or other private property

  7. Kenneth Aaron on

    Its hard to feel so disenfranchised. The vote was 63% the highest in the nation up to that point. Still a complete lack of cooperation from our public servants. Why even have a vote in the first place..? Is this America..?

  8. Kenneth Aaron on

    Looks like they might try to get it done before election day. Removing the peoples’ right to self-determination. Which is already in process. How infuriating and blatant this all is. And the large companies are known for lackluster product as well. Many people go back to the black market to get stronger meds.

  9. The only way to beat these -astards is to vote for legalization of all forms of cannabis and allowing private cultivation. Nothing but greed is fueling this debate. Let’s finish this -ullshit in Nov. 2016.

  10. Dennis Pielack on

    The People passed the MMMA for the People of the State of Michigan to use marijuana for medical purposes. This law has been from the beginning frustrated in its intent by certain stale prejudices manifested in key persons in our Michigan government: most importantly, Governor Snyder, Bill Schuette, their inner-circle, their cronies in law enforcement and in the judicial branch. Now, we see why. They care not for the People and how to best provide a GOD-given medicine to the greatest benefit of the People, but to make money for the State by granting favors by legislation to the highest bidder, and denying individual caretakers to distribute the extent of their overages to independent dispensaries or patients outside of their personal care. Only Michigan grown marijuana, and Michigan based businesses owned and operated by native Michiganders, should be allowed to serve the People of Michigan. And our leaders would do well to drop their “reefer madness” prejudice, observe Genesis 1:29 with awe and thanksgiving, and experience marijuana instead of their next martini or oxycotin, and cease prohibiting patients from fair, economical, reasonable, easy access to their medicine. If they put as much time and effort into the meaning of Marriage to be between a man and a woman as they do to prohibit marijuana, SCOTUS might have decided differently.

Leave A Reply