- The Weed Blog https://www.theweedblog.com

US Supreme Court Asked To Rule On Use Of Drug Sniffing Dogs In Private Residences


dog with marijuanaBy Curt Anderson

Franky the drug dog’s supersensitive nose is at the heart of a question being put to the U.S. Supreme Court: Does a police dog’s sniff outside a house give officers the right to get a search warrant for illegal drugs, or is the sniff an unconstitutional search?

Florida’s highest state court has said Franky’s ability to detect marijuana growing inside a Miami-area house from outside a closed front door crossed the constitutional line. The state’s attorney general wants the Supreme Court to reverse that ruling.

The justices could decide this month whether to take the case, the latest dispute about whether the use of dogs to find drugs, explosives and other illegal or dangerous substances violates the Fourth Amendment protection against illegal search and seizure.

Many court watchers expect the justices will take up the case.

Read More at: http://www.ajc.com/news/nation-world/decided-by-a-nose-1287364.html


Article From Associated Press Wire


About Author

1 Comment

  1. Here is why this will be a retarded case, if the supreme court decides to hear this case.
    -The supreme court is no longer independent of the federal government.
    -The feds will not come clean about its marijuana lies.
    – The supreme court has already ruled that if a police officer thinks he smells pot, he has the right to bust down the door to search for the imaginary pot.
    – The federal government will not rule against itself. The constitution is not relevant to supreme court rulings.

Leave A Reply